Journal of Nutrition LabDiet, Your World of Nutritional Answers

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Nutr. (October 28, 2009). doi:10.3945/jn.109.112565
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Publish Ahead of Print[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
139/12/2344    most recent
jn.109.112565v1
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friesen, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Innis, S. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Friesen, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Innis, S. M.
© 2009 American Society for Nutrition


Nutritional Epidemiology

Dietary Arachidonic Acid to EPA and DHA Balance Is Increased among Canadian Pregnant Women with Low Fish Intake1,2,3

Russell W. Friesen and Sheila M. Innis*

Nutrition and Metabolism Research Program, Child and Family Research Institute, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 4H4

Arachidonic [ARA, 20:4(n-6)], eicosapentaenoic [EPA, 20:5(n-3)], and docosahexaenoic acids [DHA, 22:6(n-3)] occur in the diet in animal tissue lipids, play important roles in human development and health, but have interactive and opposing functions. Meat and poultry have higher ARA and fish are richer in EPA and DHA. National databases were recently revised to include complete data on ARA in foods. We used a validated FFQ and the revised nutrient databases to quantify the distribution of ARA, EPA, and DHA intakes and balance for 204 healthy Canadian pregnant women. We focused on intake distributions because risk of adverse health effects increases at lower nutrient intakes. RBC fatty acids were analyzed concurrent with dietary assessment. The distribution of ARA, EPA, and DHA intakes were skewed (P < 0.001), with a median (5–95th percentile) of 107 (41–225), 65 (10–228), and 105 (10–430) mg/d ARA, EPA, and DHA, respectively. Fish provided 66 and 76% of EPA and DHA, respectively, whereas eggs, poultry, and meats provided 81% of ARA. Women consuming <101 g fish/wk consumed less EPA and DHA and had markedly elevated median dietary ARA:EPA and ARA:DHA ratios and RBC lipid ARA:EPA + DHA ratios compared with women consuming ≥101 g fish/wk (P < 0.001). Relatively small increases in fish intake of 1–2 servings (25–50 g)/wk corrected the distorted dietary (n-6):(n-3) fatty acid balance among women consuming meats, but not fish. Median fish and DHA intakes below the recommended 1–2 servings/wk fish for pregnant women suggest major changes in the availability, cost, or acceptance of fish are needed.


* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sinnis{at}interchange.ubc.ca.

Manuscript received 6 July 2009. Initial review completed 25 August 2009. Revision accepted 14 October 2009.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
Copyright © 2009 by American Society for Nutrition